|Graph from WHO showing the estimated childhood death toll worldwide. (Measles is red.)|
"Measles is one of the leading causes of death among young children even though a safe and cost-effective vaccine is available."Another point is:
"Measles vaccination resulted in a 78% drop in measles deaths between 2000 and 2008 worldwide."Here's the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) page on possible complications of measles. Okay, pneumonia (what else is new), ear infections, diarrhea... whoa, wait. SSPE (Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis)? "Rare, but fatal" encephalitis?
Yeah, you heard it: encephalitis.
Here's an article from Medical News Today about how much of a stir the disease causes even in "developed" countries like the US.
Good news! It's covered under the MMR (Measles/Mumps/Rubella) vaccine, usually given to young kids, which confers lifelong immunity!
You may have been hearing about this lately, because it's rumored to "cause" autism. Okay, that's unfair; mostly people who are proponents of this theory are saying MMR and autism are "linked." Only slightly better, since word choice doesn't change that it's a load of crap. Okay, I guess that's unfair, too, because [as a reasonable, thinking scientific person] I would approach it as a possibility. Pertinent: a possibility and no more. There's literally no scientific evidence that even remotely suggests such a connection.
Finally, here's the CDC page addressing this precise topic. Guess what?
"To date, the studies continue to show that vaccines are not associated with [Autism Spectrum Disorders]."(That emphasis on "not" is theirs.) In the meantime panicked parents and fear-mongers (who we sometimes refer to as "the media" when we're feeling charitable) are using falsified information from a 30-year-old study by some British physician. Oh yeah, and the study was found to be fraudulent. Made-up. Hogwash. This physician, Andrew Wakefield, was subsequently found guilty of several conflicts of interest and professional misconduct by the General Medical Council of the UK and they basically kicked him out, disallowing him from ever practicing medicine again in the UK (not that anyone else would have him, either). The article was originally published in The Lancet, a prestigious medical journal in 1998, but when they found out he screwed with the data they retracted it, even going so far as publishing a statement (you can get a free Lancet account to see the whole thing, but it basically lists the allegations against Wakefield) distancing themselves from Wakefield and his bunk study (NB couldn't even find the study on TheLancet.com, though I did find Wakefield's response to the retraction). Even after all this the MMR vaccine controversy goes on (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). *sigh*
The worst part is that lives were worsened because of Wakefield's irresponsible idiocy. This is an article by the parent of an autistic child who suffered under the false claims of a connection between autism and MMR.
Oh wait, maybe the worst part is that lives are in danger because of Wakefield's irresponsible idiocy. Like most vaccines, the MMR depends heavily on "herd immunity," which is the idea that if the majority of the members of a population are vaccinated and are therefore immune to the disease, the few members of the population that can't be vaccinated for whatever reason (immunocompromised, allergies, etc) are protected. Maybe there isn't a 100% guarantee that they won't contract the disease they can't be vaccinated against, but the un-vaccinated members of a population are normally few enough that a disease can't just leapfrog between populations.
I feel the need to explain herd immunity farther (here begins the mini-lesson on vaccines and epidemiology). Think about a hypothetical situation in which there are three populations of about a hundred members, and there's a communicable pathogen--for simplicity, we'll just stick with measles. If you plotted the locations of the populations on a map, they would roughly form a line; let's call them A (western-most), B (middle), and C (eastern-most).
|Excuse my handwriting, but I thought I could explain it better with a figure.|
|Pop A is infected (either partially or wholly), B has been vaccinated (either partially or wholly), and C has been protected from the spread of the virus (red arrow) by the vaccine (blue X) even though they haven't been vaccinated.|
What if C is allergic to something in the vaccine? There are lots of things in vaccines that aren't the actual "active ingredient," things like antibiotics to prevent bacterial contamination, that people can be allergic to. Here's an info sheet (PDF) about what's in a vaccine from the American Association of Pediatricians.
Another possibility: C could have a weakened immune system. Maybe C has cancer and is undergoing radiation or chemotherapy, or has an autoimmune disorder (eg rheumatoid arthritis) and takes immunosuppressant drugs to keep their symptoms in check. C could also take immunosuppressants because they recieved an organ transplant and need to keep their body from rejecting the foreign cells of the organ. C could have HIV or AIDS. It's extremely dangerous to give many vaccines to people with compromised immune systems, because many vaccines are what's known as attenuated vaccines (they contain only weakened viruses, not completely killed). Why would we do this, purposely expose someone to a potentially infective organism? Because sometimes that's the only way to get the body to react enough to make the vaccine work (look for the blue highlighting). It also has the added benefit of triggering a longer-lasting (in some cases, lifelong) immunity. But if someone has a weakened immune system, even the extremely weakened virus in the vaccine could produce disease symptoms. So we can't vaccinate them. (Actually, I know I already linked to this ("react... work") but it's a really good primer on vaccines.)
Back to my story: for some reason (which isn't important here) C cannot be vaccinated. Well, guess what happens if B isn't vaccinated because his parents didn't know about herd immunity (among other reasons)...
|Look'a that: everyone's infected.|
These diagrams and explanations can also be applied to a three-person system (as in A, B, and C are just people). So let's look at another system.
|The colors mean the same thing; red is infected, blue is resistant, and green is susceptible.|
In short: not vaccinating your children because of lies spun by a morally-bankrupt "scientist" is irresponsible and potentially injurious to: a) your children, because it is far more likely that no vaccination will lead to potentially life-threatening (and preventable) illness than vaccination will lead to autism, and b) to the your community, both local and larger, because you risk upsetting the balance and benefit of herd immunity.
Please: vaccinate your kids.